Starring
- Andrew Garfield
- Emma Stone
- Rhys Ifans
- Denis Leary
- Martin Sheen
- Sally Field
Original Theatrical Release Date: 07/03/2012
Running Time: 136 mins
Synopsis: The Amazing Spider-Man is the story of Peter Parker (Garfield), an outcast high schooler who was abandoned by his parents as a boy, leaving him to be raised by his Uncle Ben (Sheen) and Aunt May (Field). Like most teenagers, Peter is trying to figure out who he is and how he got to be the person he is today. As Peter discovers a mysterious briefcase that belonged to his father, he begins a quest to understand his parents' disappearance - leading him directly to Oscorp and the lab of Dr. Curt Connors (Ifans), his father's former partner. As Spider-Man is set on a collision course with Connors' alter-ego, The Lizard, Peter will make life-altering choices to use his powers and shape his destiny to become a hero. --From Rotten Tomatoes
Review: It's very hard not to like this movie, especially if you liked 2002's 'Spider-Man', because they are extremely similar. While the film didn't tread much new ground, it was good enough to see what the future of the franchise is in store for.
So let's start with what's familiar. Boy gets bitten by spider. Boy likes girl. Scientist trying to test his experiment on himself ends with him turning into a green bad guy. Uncle Ben still dies. The main difference with the characters is the switch up of Mary Jane Watson with Gwen Stacy (who in Raimi's series, did not show up until the 3rd film). Also, like the comics, in this movie, Peter makes his webshooters.
The action sequences were great. The CGI on Spider-man, like the previous movies, was just stellar. The 3D was actually good. Most of the cast I really liked them in their roles. Andrew Garfield pulled off a slightly different version of Peter Parker. Emma Stone shines in just about any movie she's in. Rhys Ifans was also a very good bad guy.
While I think Andrew Garfield was a good Peter/Spider-Man, I still don't think he trumps Tobey Maguire. As much as I like Sally Fields, I don't think she, nor Martin Sheen, were the right choice for Uncle Ben and Aunt May. The dialogue to me was slightly cheesier in this movie than the others. The original trilogy was a bit more campy, which I liked because Spider-man is kind of campy himself. The score for the movie fell flat. The music in Raimi's 'Spider-man', done by Danny Elfman, was powerful and added intensely to the movie. James Horner does the score for the new Spidey flick, and it falls short.
So I know there's a lot more negative that I have here than positive. And that's because it's hard not to compare it to a movie that is so great, that wasn't made that long ago. But despite me preferring the originals, this was a solid movie, one that I thoroughly enjoyed and excited to see what's next for our favorite wall crawling superhero.
So let's start with what's familiar. Boy gets bitten by spider. Boy likes girl. Scientist trying to test his experiment on himself ends with him turning into a green bad guy. Uncle Ben still dies. The main difference with the characters is the switch up of Mary Jane Watson with Gwen Stacy (who in Raimi's series, did not show up until the 3rd film). Also, like the comics, in this movie, Peter makes his webshooters.
The action sequences were great. The CGI on Spider-man, like the previous movies, was just stellar. The 3D was actually good. Most of the cast I really liked them in their roles. Andrew Garfield pulled off a slightly different version of Peter Parker. Emma Stone shines in just about any movie she's in. Rhys Ifans was also a very good bad guy.
While I think Andrew Garfield was a good Peter/Spider-Man, I still don't think he trumps Tobey Maguire. As much as I like Sally Fields, I don't think she, nor Martin Sheen, were the right choice for Uncle Ben and Aunt May. The dialogue to me was slightly cheesier in this movie than the others. The original trilogy was a bit more campy, which I liked because Spider-man is kind of campy himself. The score for the movie fell flat. The music in Raimi's 'Spider-man', done by Danny Elfman, was powerful and added intensely to the movie. James Horner does the score for the new Spidey flick, and it falls short.
So I know there's a lot more negative that I have here than positive. And that's because it's hard not to compare it to a movie that is so great, that wasn't made that long ago. But despite me preferring the originals, this was a solid movie, one that I thoroughly enjoyed and excited to see what's next for our favorite wall crawling superhero.
Score: