Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Alan Time Jumps with the X-Men in 'Days of Future Past'





Starring
  • James McAvoy
  • Michael Fassbender
  • Hugh Jackman
  • Jennifer Lawrence
  • Patrick Stewart
  • Ian McKellan
  • Peter Dinklage
  • Halle Berry
Original Theatrical Release Date: 05/23/2014
Running Time: 131 mins

SynopsisThe ultimate X-Men ensemble fights a war for the survival of the species across two time periods in X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST. The beloved characters from the original "X-Men" film trilogy join forces with their younger selves from the past, "X-Men: First Class," in order to change a major historical event and fight in an epic battle that could save our future. --From Rotten Tomatoes

Review: The X-Men franchise has had its ups and downs, with 'X2: X-Men United' probably being considered the best by most, and 'X-Men: The Last Stand' and 'X-Men Origins: Wolverine' faring among the worst. I, personally, liked all four of the 'X-Men' movies, and found both of the solo Wolverine outings a bit disappointing. But all in all, I'm a fan of the series as a whole. And if you are, then you're in for a treat.

'Days of Future Past' isn't as good as the previous installments. It's better. The storyline involves a somewhat dystopian future where machines called Sentinels are sent out to eradicate mutants. The plan backfires on the humans to a point, as the Sentinels not only target mutants, but they start targeting regular humans that do carry the necessary genetics to pass along to their potential mutant offspring. There doesn't seem to be a split between good and bad mutants in this future, as Professor Xavier and Magneto (played again by Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan) are working together to try to stop this from happening. Enter Ellen Page as Kitty Pryde who uses her powers to send Wolverine's conscious back into the body of his younger self. This is where the series of course starts to merge the original series with the 'First Class' series. His objective is to partner with Professor X and Magneto of the past (James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender) to stop Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence) from killing the creator of the Sentinels, as her actions are pretty much what causes this terrible future. From that point, you just watch the Butterfly Effect take hold as different actions cause aspects of history to change. To see if it pans out, you'll have to see the movie for yourself. 

I was completely engaged the entire time. But that isn't saying that this new 'X-Men' isn't without its flaws. It's hard to tell whether this is a sequel, or a reboot. I know the cast is the same. So it should be a sequel, right? Well, therein lies the problem. 'Days of Future Past' does acknowledge bits and pieces of the previous movies. But it also completely ignores others. If director Bryan Singer had decided to completely retcon, or ignore the events of, 'X-Men: The Last Stand' and 'X-Men Origins: Wolverine', erasing them from the canon, that would be one thing. But the continuity will definitely make you scratch your head in confusion. How is X alive? How did Y get this power? And so forth. So the movie forces you to remember the moments of the older movies that are referenced in this one, and pretty much throw the rest out of the window. 

If you're wanting an excellent 'X-Men' film, you have it in 'Days of Future Past'. Not since 'X2' has the series been this exciting. And while I do wish some of the continuity was explained or addressed, I'm also okay with just going with the flow and seeing what the franchise has in store for it next. 'Days of Future Past' has a great story, great cast (including cameos from earlier stars of the series), and astounding special effects. With a year full of superhero movies, 'X-Men: Days of Future Past' ranks as the best one for me thus far. 
Score




Friday, May 2, 2014

Is 'Amazing Spider-Man 2' Just That, or Does it Fall Flat?





Starring
  • Andrew Garfield
  • Emma Stone
  • Jamie Foxx
  • Sally Field
  • Dane DeHaan
Original Theatrical Release Date: 05/02/2014
Running Time: 142 mins

SynopsisWe've always known that Spider-Man's most important battle has been within himself: the struggle between the ordinary obligations of Peter Parker and the extraordinary responsibilities of Spider-Man. But in The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Peter Parker finds that a greater conflict lies ahead. It's great to be Spider-Man (Andrew Garfield). For Peter Parker, there's no feeling quite like swinging between skyscrapers, embracing being the hero, and spending time with Gwen (Emma Stone). But being Spider-Man comes at a price: only Spider-Man can protect his fellow New Yorkers from the formidable villains that threaten the city. With the emergence of Electro (Jamie Foxx), Peter must confront a foe far more powerful than he. And as his old friend, Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan), returns, Peter comes to realize that all of his enemies have one thing in common: OsCorp.  --From Rotten Tomatoes

Review: So it goes without saying that I'm a big Spider-Man fan. He's been my favorite superhero since I was a kid. And Sam Raimi's 'Spider-Man' trilogy not only belongs to my favorite superhero movies, but my favorite movies in general. Yes, I even really enjoyed the third one that everyone else on the planet seems to hate, even if it was my least favorite of them. 

One of my biggest issues with the reboot series is that it isn't necessary. While I liked the first installment, I felt like the better parts of it still weren't better than the worst parts of the original trilogy. I've had people tell me not to compare the two, but considering 'Spider-Man 3' came out a mere seven years ago, it seems kind of hard not to when that series is so fresh in my mind. I'd probably think differently if that set of flicks were terrible. But they weren't. THEY were the amazing Spider-Man movies. And the actual 'The Amazing Spider-Man' was decent, but failed to live up to the superior version.

'The Amazing Spider-Man 2' pretty much falls in the same exact category. It was good. But that's all it was. There were some things this sequel did that bested it's predecessor, and there were some things that were most definitely worse. I'll start off with the good. Andrew Garfield was much better in this movie. In his first run in the red and blue spandex, his Peter Parker wasn't really that likable. He was kind of arrogant, and just not the geek-to-hero character I've always envisioned as Peter Parker. But in the sequel, his portrayal of Parker isn't so moody. Emma Stone pretty much turns whatever she touches into gold, and her and Garfield's chemistry is spot-on, much more so than it was the last go round. 

The special effects were mind-blowingly good. Every time I see a new 'Spider-Man' movie, I literally sit in awe at just how great it looks seeing Spider-Man web sling through the city. And Electro's scenes were just as awe-inspiring to look at.  

So now to the negative. My first complaint is the story and script. Jamie Foxx's Electro storyline with him pretty much being obsessed with whoever gives him attention was just annoying and boring. He had the cheesiest dialogue. Jamie Foxx is a great actor. This movie wouldn't really support that statement. A lot of his dialogue made me have flashbacks to Joel Schumacher's train-wreck 'Batman & Robin'. I don't think Jamie Foxx was the problem, but his material was just lame. Harry Osbourne was severely miscast. All of you who griped about "Emo Peter" in 'Spider-Man 3'? Wait until you catch a drift of the guy who replaced James Franco. Dane DeHaan... He wasn't just a bad Harry Osbourne/Green Goblin. I don't think he's a very good actor period. The found-footage 'Chronicle' movie that I heard everyone raving about? Yeah, I wasn't impressed. So far, he is probably my biggest complaint about the new series. 

There's many pros and cons to this movie. One of the scenes at the end of the movie is probably one of the most heartfelt and tragic between both series. The score still wasn't as good as Danny Elfman's, even with Marc Webb bringing in Hans Zimmer to replace James Horner. Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone had great screen chemistry. But still not as good as Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst. Spider-Man's witty one-liners were on the whole pretty amusing. Everyone else's were just bad. The backstory of Peter's parents was a good touch. The special effects were just spectacular, despite the fact that the slow-motion feature was overkilled. 

If you thought 'The Amazing Spider-Man' was better than the Raimi series, you'll like this one equally as much. If you're like me, and you liked it but still would've preferred a 'Spider-Man 4' to continue the original series, you'll probably like this one too, but it won't convince you that this reboot was a terrific idea. And if you haven't liked any of the Spidey flicks so far, you'll like this one even less. 
Score